Sunday, May 4, 2014

Personal Synthesis & Feminist Analysis

While when most of us originally saw the movie when it came out in 1987, the majority of us were 14 years old and like myself included had worn out the movie which was on VHS during that time period had fallen head of heels in love or lust for that sexy main character, "Johnny." While the majority of us, who's mothers had allowed us to watch the movie and probably watched it as well, assumed it was nothing more than a mushie love story with an excess amount  of dance scenes with the ultimate dance scene at the end. Little did she really think about it, especially in the 1980's that the movie would inclued such issue's stemming from socio-economic class, rape/date-rape, abortion, and as many sex scenes as there were.

As, we watched it recently in class and had to actually look for different points throughtout the film, while I still enjoyed the film as I had so many years prior but realized so many things popped out at me now as an adult.

What really stuck out for me was that the movie's setting was the early 1960's and actually 1963 to be correct. However, it seemed that while there were approaching subjects more dealt with in the 1980's, they dealt with them in the movie as if they were dealing with these issues on an everyday basis. These subjects were not small and innocent ones either and back in the 60's issues of this sort were not usually spoke about so casually like they were done in the movie. From very apparent socio-economic class difference that are not only talked about but you really see the differences between the two throughout the movie. There was even a casual conversation at a staff meeting about what you can and cannot do with or to the guests, A husband casually paying someone to more or less enjoy his wife ( a clear sign of prostitution), A more prominent topic casually describing someone who thinks he is of better class but in the end, Penny is pregnant and because of her present situation as a dancer which pays her bills, so that she can afford to live and survive, doesn't include being able to be pregnant and she opts for an abortion. Which was never called that in the movie but referred to very clearly. That same guy, who thinks he is so much better and of higher standards and class, attempts to Rape another woman. In my opinion someone like that, if in real life would be loser with absolutely no social class. 

One of the things we had talked about in our Women's class was about abortion  and when it came the 1960's, Abortion was very illegal and if you check out http://www.projectvoice.org. You will find some stories from older women that talk about when they had to make the choice to have an abortion and what had to be done to have that happen. There aren't too many stories of older women but none the less all the women's stories are important and they decided to post them for people to understand what they were going through and what happens after, their feelings and emotions. Which in the movie doesn't talk about what Penny goes through emotional wise but she does open up to Baby before and tell her that she is scared, and she has the right to be.

In this film, Baby's father on several attempts also tries to assert his authority or Patriarchal values or views if you will in the case of who Baby, "His daughter plans to be" to impress people, when he has to come to the rescue of Penny's botched abortion and in telling or yelling at Baby for lieing and telling her she can't hang around "Those People." Also, at the the end of the film when he confronts johnny about knowing he wasn't the one to get Penny into trouble.

However, I think Baby is the big start in this film, besides for the fact like I said earlier the setting of the film was in 1963 and that Baby stood up for what she believed in being, borrowing the money in the beginning of the movie, Seducing Johnny, or even going behind her fathers back of all things. The fact that Baby never thought of herself as someone better than Johnny or Penny or even any of the dancers and that she just lets Johnny go basically as fast as he had come into her life shows that she is not a selfish person. It shows a lot for her character and I think that is why Johnny calls her "Frances" at the End of the movie. 

http://www.projectvoice.org

Multimedia Connection

In connection to my essay and my project, I had to find comments from people who had watched the movie, Dirty Dancing and what they thought and then link it to my essay White Enough by Richard Dyer. For Many they really like or rather they absolutely loved the movie.
 
I went on to http://www.IMDb.com and found this particular comment out of all of them because while they didn't particularly like the movie as an adult unlike they had remembered loving it as a teenager.

On IMDb.com Dirty Dancing from 1987, received a rating of 6.8 out 10 from 105,885 users. They also have what is called a Metascore and that was a rating of 65 out of 100. The reviews were from 373 users with 80 critics and 20 from Metacritic.com.
 
#1 Movie Review
 
A giant cliché: Just a bad movie
Posted by: Author: texas_031 from United States
 
They gave it only 1 Star.
Posted on: 19 December 2005
 
 
You know, as you get older, you somehow think the movies you did not like when you were younger, might have been because of your youth and inexperience. Case in point, when I saw The Godfather at age 14, I thought it was boring. 20 years later, its an incredible movie to me. In other words, I grew up and began to appreciate great movies.

So I rented Dirty Dancing with my girlfriend last night on her request, as she loved it at age 14 and I hated it at the same age. But I hoped, because I was young and stupid at age 14, perhaps this would be a new experience for me. So I sat down with her to watch, hoping to be enlightened.

Well, the night after watching Dirty Dancing, I feel a violation. I feel like someone reached into my soul and robbed me of 2 hours of my life from watching this cheese fest.

First, Patrick Swayze plays a 20 year old, but he looks like he is 35. And the premise of the movie is him seducing some underage teenager, wooing her with his dance moves. Really Creepy.

Anyway, the movie is the cliché plot where the "wrong side of the tracks" guy and the "rich smart girl" accidentally fall in love with each other. Of course, their romance is fueled by the fact the "rich girl" can't dance a lick, so the "poor hero" teaches her in a week to become an expert dancer for the big end of vacation show, or something like that.

But you guessed it: The disapproving father soon enters and forbids the two to see each other, and the movie progresses to secret meetings of dance lessons and love making. This all culminates into the final scene where the entire resort rallies around the two young lovers while the once antagonistic father accepts the 35 year old dancer as his teen daughter's new man.

Even my girlfriend whimpered at the end of the movie as she admitted it was not anything like she remembered. I didn't press her, but I did smirk a little, and put the Godfather part II in the DVD player.
 
 
Now, what I found striking about this review is that he rented this movie as adult even though he knew when he was 14 he hated the movie but knowing his girlfriend loved it he rented it anyways. What I didn't necessarily agree with and I am not saying his opinion is wrong or anything because everyone has a right to their own opinions but I don't think its a cliché plot, I just think its a romance movie with a twist to the plot. What I don't also agree with is and I don't think that they portrayed Baby in the movie or in the book as a "Rich" girl, they did however portrait her as a smart girl, that I will agree with. In the essay it centers around how the Jewish father forbids his daughter to be around "those people" but yet Baby sneaks around behind his back and like the reviewer says the final scene. I don't know if I would go as far as the reviewer and not remember it being like it was when I was 14 and put in a movie like the Godfather, but to each their own!!
 
 
 
 
#2 Movie Review
 
 So, the next place I went to find a review regarding the Movie, Dirty Dancing was http://www.Amazon.com which I had to also type in Amazon Movie reviews because it would have sent me to the actual site to buy stuff from Amazon. When I finally got to the right place and found the correct Dirty Dancing film from 1987, since there are several films out right now. I found that they gave the film a rating of 6.8 out of 10 with 1,066 reviews on it.

You'll have the time of your life!
5 out of 5 stars rating!!
June 5, 2001

"amyshamrock" (Missouri)
 
This review is from: Dirty Dancing [VHS] (VHS Tape)

For a PG-13 film, this has got to be the sexiest film I've seen. This movie is a typical love story: girl and guy are different "classes"...girl and guy get together anyway...people object, etc. However, this film manages to get, and keep, your attention through several plot twists. Jennifer Grey stars as "Baby" a spoiled daddy's girl. Baby goes with her family to a resort for summer vacation. There, she meets Johnny Castle (Patrick Swayze), the defiant and seductive dance instructor. Even though Baby is encouraged to learn "lady-like" dances and crafts, her heart's desire is to be a rebel for once in her life & dance like the staff...dirty dancing. When Johnny loses his dance partner, Baby takes over...even though she's never danced like that before. It is obvious that Johnny is not pleased with the arrangement, but decides to endure the torture. During Baby's private dance lessons, the music is great and the chemistry between the two actors is absolutely sizzling! This is very much a "coming-of-age" film. We get to see several characters grow up and learn life lessons quickly in this movie. Although this movie appeals to a younger crowd, my best friend's mother is one of the biggest fans I know!! I was somewhat disappointed with the ending, but overall, this is one of my favorite films of all times. This is a must see & a "must buy"...you'll want to see it again and again.
 
Out of all the reviews that I looked at on the Amazon website, this one really hit home with the essay I read. The author of my essay, Richard Dyer talked through out it about how the were from different classes, just like the lady talks about it in her review. Also, just like in the essay as well as in this review they talk about how there are two different style dances and how Baby from the start was to learn the Good girl dances but she was drawn to the bad boy dances, the dirty dancing. Also they both talk about how especially Baby growing up before our eyes throughout the movie as well in my essay. She starts in the beginning by listening to her father but then she starts to find her way to make her own decisions from helping penny after her procedure to finally showing in a sense that Johnny is not that the bad guy her father thinks he is. The reader in a sense is correct that this movie is for a younger crowd and I believe the book (essay) might be more for a older crowd to fully understand but none the less it is a love story and a story of a girl come in to her own skin and body and standing up for what she believes.
 
 
3rd and Final Movie Review!!
 
 
The last one that I found for reviews was on http://rottentomatoes.com and I found the way they do their rating system was quite interesting so I just had to share it with you all.
 
Tomatometer: 72%
Average Rating 6 out of 10
Reviews Counted: 54
Fresh: 39/ Rotten: 15
 
Liked it: 90%
Average Rating: 3.7 out of 5
User Ratings: 1,051,705
 
This I thought was interesting in how they set the introduction to the description of the move:
 
"A teenage girl learns about love, adult responsibility, and how to do the Dirty Boogie in this Romantic drama." (Eleanor Bergstein)



Daniel P Super Reviewer
3 out of 5 starts
April 15, 2007

Completely anachronistic boilerplate dance film: young person - man this time, played by Patrick Swayze - of lower social class wins heart of upper-class young person (woman, Jennifer Grey) through the power of dance... or something. What made this movie watchable for me was the particularity of its setting; I don't know of any other films set in the Catskills in the 1960s, and buried within it is a story of (Jewish) identity and coming of age, told nostalgically and enjoyably. The bubble bursts when a 1980s song drives the film's finale - selling the soundtrack more than the story, to say the least - but, (along with Saturday Night Fever), it cast the mold for a certain kind of film: the summer sing-and-dance blockbuster. Essential viewing, unfortunately - even for guys like me who don't want to admit it,


While there were many of the same reviews that all said the same things about how they liked the movie and it was all about a love story and Patrick Swayze was this and that. This particular review was right down my alley with my essay and the reviewer Daniel's comments about not only the "lower social class" (Daniel, April 15, 2007) but also everything from the jewish boys, Baby coming in to her skin (or so to say). Also, what was interesting is how the reviewer mentions about Saturday Night Fever and also the author of the essay that I read, Richard Dyer also mentions in the essay about Saturday Night Fever. I just found it interesting that he talks about the same things that correlate with the essay that I read.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dirty_dancing/reviews/#type=user

 
 
 
 

Reader Response~~

Now, when I went to find reviews regarding the book, "The Time of Our Lives: Dirty Dancing and Popular Culture " by Yannis Tzioumakis and Sian Lincoln who were the main editors of the book along with many other authors who contributed to the book including Richard Dyer who is the author of the Chapter that I have analyzed earlier.

So, when I went on and search for reviews of this book and found it rather difficult I went on to http://www.goodreads.com and found that there were no reviews to it but did however find this bit of information rather interesting and thought I would share it with everyone.

It was actually published by Wayne State University Press, and they go on talking about how the authors Tzioumakis and Lincoln really analyze the impact that Dirty Dancing had on the culture in the years since its original release and actually divide it into four sections. It goes on to explain about how "Essays in "Dirty Dancing in Context" look at the film from several perspectives, including its production and distribution history, its blending of genres, its treatment of race, and its place in the political and visual culture of the 1980's." (Wayne State University Press, March 18th, 2013) Lastly, its talks about how many the film offers many chances for "thought-provoking analysis."  (Wayne State University Press, March 18th, 2013)

I thought this was interesting because the chapter of the book that I had the chance to read does offer the insight to all of these perspectives and it was really interesting that this little synopsis would describe it too a tee.

Wayne State University Press. The Time of Our Lives: Dirty Dancing and Popular Culture (Contemporary Approaches to Film and Media Series). March 18th, 2013. Retrieved on May 4th, 2014 from



 
 
And for the Second Book Review!!
 
 
After I searched around and check on Amazon which didn't have any reviews on the book like the above one, I decided to check on http://www.barnesandnoble.com and to my surprise there was just one review and as much as I thought it was a good book, apparently this reader didn't think the same. Here is what this reader thought of the book with only 1 star that was given.
 
 
It was posted by: Anonymous
Posted on: May 9, 2013
 
":( MAD"
"Cant believe it read sample to see the first part of the story BUT GUESS WHAT THEY JUST REPEAT THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN IM SO MAD"
 
Well, like I said before this person, not sure if it being a man or a women but it seems they are very upset being they only gave the book at 1 star. Now, I can some what understand what they are saying because when I did read the one chapter that went along with this project, I did notice a lot of the same things being repeated over and over. I can't speak for the rest of the book but for what I read the author, Richard Dyer, he did repeat a lot of the same thing through out the chapter. So, I guess what I am saying is I don't blame him completely but I would have gave it another star if not at least 2 more stars because the chapter was decent.
 
 
Wayne State University Press. The Time of Our Lives: Dirty Dancing and Popular Culture (Contemporary Approaches to Film and Media Series). March 31, 2013. Retrieved on May 2, 2013 from
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Critical Context~~ White Enough by Richard Dyer

In the beginning of the essay "White Enough" by Richard Dyer he starts with a section that I thought really sumed up a good amount of the essay. "The dirtiness of the dancing in Dirty Dancing is most obviously sexual, and faily obviously class-based; rather more equivocally, it is also racial. As Anahid Kassabian notes, the dirty dancing is "not-quite-white"; I was to argues that, all the same, it is white enough. (Richard Dryer)  

It seems that a common theme throughout his whole essay and that is about the "nice Jewish boys" (73) The other themes that go throughout the essay have to do with Prostitution, Socio-Economic class of "Neil at Cornell and Robbie at Yale, paths that mean they are just the kinds of boys Lisa and Baby, respectively, should have sex (that is, dance and have babies) with." (73) The other example is when "Neil reminds Baby of what he's got that Johnny doesn't and that all the girls adore; two hotels." (74) 

The author goes on to talk about the not-quite-white aspect and it has to do with the "real dirty dancers, are very mixed racially, and many might be perceived (probably correctly) as Latina/o." (76) To better affirm what the author is saying he goes on to say, "In all the ways, a great deal of the dancing, whether sexually awkward or abandoned, is coded as not-quite-white." (76)

Along with all of this, the author throws in a little comment about Max at the end of the film when he gets on stage with Coles who is the band leader. The author is talking about how it seems that "there may be a very slight anxiety around gender and queerness with the limp wrist and dancing with a man [albeit not touching], but that doesn't seem to me to be at the forefront of this short moment. 

This article was difficult to really read and take in because he did a lot of reusing the same ideas of socio-economic class, race/racist ideas, culture. Like I said before it was a lot of the same information over and over so there wasn't a lot of information or his opinion that I didn't know just that it was incredibly reused a lot.  


Dyer, Richard. "White Enough." The Time of Our Lives: Dirty Dancing and Popular Culture. Eds. Yannis Tzioumakis and Sian Lincoln. Detroit: Wayne State UP, 2013. 73-85.